Dalpat Kumar and Anr. v. Prahlad Singh and Ors. AIR 1993 SC 276,

the Supreme Court explained the scope of aforesaid material circumstances, but observed as under: The phrases `prima facie case', `balance of convenience' and ` irreparable loss' are not rhetoric phrases for incantation, but words of width and elasticity, to meet myriad situations presented by man's ingenuity in given facts and circumstances, but always is hedged with sound exercise of judicial discretion to meet the ends of justice. The facts rest eloquent and speak for themselves. It is well nigh impossible to find from facts prima facie case and balance of convenience