Pages

Sep 6, 2009

State of Rajasthan Vs. Naresh @ Ram Naresh Cr.A. No. 837 of 2002 Decided by supreme court on: 26.08.2009

An order of acquittal should not be lightly interfered with even if the court believes that there is some evidence pointing out the finger towards the accused. The view that is taken by the High Court is found to be a plausible view, and therefore, the benefit must always go to the accused and not to the prosecution. If the prosecution wants to prove the fact, the same must be proved by leading evidence, which is reliable and trustworthy, which pinpoints and conclusively proves the guilt of the accused.

No comments:

Post a Comment