Pages

Apr 7, 2009

Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur and Co., and another AIR 1954 SC 44 The apex Court held that the obligations of the parties to a contract for sale of land are the same as in other ordinary contracts and consequently there is no conceivable reason why the doctrine of frustration should not be applicable to contracts for sale of land in India.

No comments:

Post a Comment