कल हमें किसी ने रोका,
और पुछा इतनी गफलत में क्यों रहते हो,
इतनी लापरवाही से क्यों चलाते हो,
अंग्रेजी मिल जाती है या देशी में काम चलाते हो,
हमने सोचा कि बता दे,
अंग्रेजी या देशी अब असर नहीं करती,
किन्हीं आँखों से इतनी पी आए है कि अब तो दवा भी असर नहीं करती।
Praveen Gupta
Jun 4, 2012
State of U P Vs Amarmani Tripathi, (2005) 8 SCC 21
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India observed as
“18. It is well settled that the matters to be considered in an application for bail are (i) whether there is any prima facie or reasonable ground to believe that the accused had committed the offence; (ii) nature and gravity of the charge; (iii) severity of the punishment in the event of conviction; (iv) danger of the accused absconding or fleeing, if released on bail; (v) character, behaviour, means, position and standing of the accused; (vi) likelihood of the offence being repeated; (vii) reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tampered with; and (viii) danger, of course, of justice being thwarted by grant of bail [see Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi and Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.)]. While a vague allegation that the accused may tamper with the evidence or witnesses may not be a ground to refuse bail, if the accused is of such character that his mere presence at large would intimidate the witnesses or if there is material to show that he will use his liberty to subvert justice or tamper with the evidence, then bail will be refused. We may also refer to the following principles relating to grant or refusal of bail stated in 22. While a detailed examination of the evidence is to be avoided while considering the question of bail, to ensure that there is no prejudging and no prejudice, a brief examination to be satisfied about the existence or otherwise of a prima facie case is necessary.”
“18. It is well settled that the matters to be considered in an application for bail are (i) whether there is any prima facie or reasonable ground to believe that the accused had committed the offence; (ii) nature and gravity of the charge; (iii) severity of the punishment in the event of conviction; (iv) danger of the accused absconding or fleeing, if released on bail; (v) character, behaviour, means, position and standing of the accused; (vi) likelihood of the offence being repeated; (vii) reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tampered with; and (viii) danger, of course, of justice being thwarted by grant of bail [see Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi and Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.)]. While a vague allegation that the accused may tamper with the evidence or witnesses may not be a ground to refuse bail, if the accused is of such character that his mere presence at large would intimidate the witnesses or if there is material to show that he will use his liberty to subvert justice or tamper with the evidence, then bail will be refused. We may also refer to the following principles relating to grant or refusal of bail stated in 22. While a detailed examination of the evidence is to be avoided while considering the question of bail, to ensure that there is no prejudging and no prejudice, a brief examination to be satisfied about the existence or otherwise of a prima facie case is necessary.”
Jun 3, 2012
हमें तो अहसास है दुनिया वालो कि हम पागल है,
हमें तो अहसास है दुनिया वालो कि हम पागल है,
पर कोई उन्हे भी तो बताओ कि उनके लिए पागल है।
वो इस तरह से मुँह फेरे बैठे है जैसे पहचानते न हो,
हम इस तरह उम्मीद में है जैसे वो भगवान ही हो।
कोई उन्हे दीवाना कर दे या हमें समझा दे
ये बेखुदी का आलम एक तरफ़ सा ही क्यों है।
Praveen Gupta
पर कोई उन्हे भी तो बताओ कि उनके लिए पागल है।
वो इस तरह से मुँह फेरे बैठे है जैसे पहचानते न हो,
हम इस तरह उम्मीद में है जैसे वो भगवान ही हो।
कोई उन्हे दीवाना कर दे या हमें समझा दे
ये बेखुदी का आलम एक तरफ़ सा ही क्यों है।
Praveen Gupta
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)