Pages

Apr 9, 2012

Ramesh kumar Agarwal Vs Rajmala Exports Pvt Ltd & Ors

Hon'ble Supreme Court of India observed on 30.03.12 as, "After filing a suit for specific performance in the year 2007, the plaintiff filed Chamber Summons No. 1233 of 2008 for amendment of plaint for impleadment of two parties as plaintiff Nos. 2 & 3 and three parties as defendant Nos. 3,4 & 5 apart from the fact that he wants to explain how money was paid. A perusal of the amendment application shows that plaintiff by this amendment seeks to incorporate certain facts, which according to him, establish that an aggregate amount of Rs. 2,05,00,000/- was paid by him.....
By the present amendment, the plaintiff furnished more details about the mode of payment of consideration. Accordingly, we hold that there is no inconsistency and the amendment sought for is not barred by limitation...

No comments:

Post a Comment