Pages

Mar 18, 2009

Crpc- Sec 105C Balram Mehani and Ors.Vs. State of M.P. (HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Decided On: 11.10.2006) “No doubt, it is true that the words terrorist activities or international crime or crime including crimes involving currency transfers, have not been used in any of the sections falling in Chapter VII-A of the Code, but that alone would not be sufficient to hold that the provisions can be invoked even when any other cognizable offence has been committed by an accused within the territory of India. The true, correct and proper interpretation of the sections falling under Chapter VII-A of the Code, would be that the same can be invoked only when it pertains to two Contracting States. Contracting States would mean that any country or place outside India on the one hand and Indian territory on the other hand, if there exists a treaty between the two countries.”

No comments:

Post a Comment